|
Interacting and
Separable Perceptual Dimensions
Previous research using discrete
static stimuli has shown that when subjects evaluate a stimulus on a dimension
of interest, they sometimes encounter interference from orthogonal variation
of an irrelevant dimension. The two dimensions interact with each other
and are considered "integral dimensions" (Garner 1974). For
example, using "converging operations," (i.e. speeded sorting,
restricted classification, and dissimilarity scaling), subjects who evaluate
the brightness of a stimulus suffer interference (i.e. speed and accuracy
deficiencies) if the irrelevant dimension of saturation is varied orthogonally.
Conversely, "separable dimensions" such as brightness and size
show no such interference (Attneave, 1950; Garner, 1974; Gottwald &
Garner, 1975; Handel & Imai, 1972).
Garner has suggested, and others (Grau & Kemler-Nelson, 1988; Melara
& Marks, 1990) have demonstrated that the dimensions of pitch and
loudness are integral. According to the traditional view, stimuli consisting
of integral dimensions are initially perceived as dimensionless, unanalyzable,
holistic "blobs" (Garner, 1974; Lockhead, 1972, 1979). The individual
dimensions constituting the stimuli in effect are not perceived. The psychological
distance between stimuli can best be described by a Euclidean metric,
and stimuli themselves are processed in a holistic, "unitary"
manner (Shepard, 1964). In other words the subject does not have primary
access to dimensions in question, and cannot selectively attend to one
dimension. Rotation of these dimensional axes therefore, does not change
in a meaningful way the psychological distance between two stimuli. This
is not to say that a dimensional structure cannot be extracted from integral
dimensions, but that it is a more derived and secondary cognitive process
(Garner 1974; Kemler-Nelson, 1993).
Alternatively, Melara and Marks (1990; Melara, Marks, & Potts, 1993)
have advanced a model of dimensional interaction that proposes a primary
orientation of the dimensional axes, and mandatory immediate access to
interacting dimensions. This access to primary axes is called attribute-level
processing, since subjects extract individual attributes from the dimensions
of interest. With interacting dimensions, the extraction of a dimensional
attribute creates a context in which attributes of the other dimension
are perceived. This influence of context is called stimulus-level processing.
In the case of interacting dimensions then, the perception of an attribute
on one dimension is influenced by the context created by an attribute
in the other dimension. In the words of Melara and Marks, "the attribute
high pitch has one perceptual meaning when paired with the attribute loud
but a different meaning when paired with the attribute soft. Context established
by loudness values thus acts to weight perceptually the extraction of
pitch information; this is stimulus-level processing." (Melara & Marks,
1990, p.399.)
For more information see:
- McBeath, M. K., & Neuhoff,
J. G. (2002). The Doppler effect is not what
you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change.
Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review 9 (2) 306-313.
- Neuhoff, J. G., Kramer,
G., & Wayand, J. (2002). Pitch
and loudness interact in auditory displays: Can the data get lost in
the map? Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied. 8 (1), 17-25.
- Neuhoff, J. G.,
McBeath, M. K., Wanzie, W. C. (1999). Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception:
A central, analytic process. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
25 (4), 1050-1059.
- Neuhoff, J. G., &
McBeath, M. K. (1996). The Doppler Illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity
change on perceived pitch. Journal
of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
22 (4) 970-985.
|